Análisis Bibliométrico de Tareas Auténticas en TBLT para el Desarrollo de la Producción Oral en Inglés (2011-2025): Bibliometric Analysis of Authentic Tasks in TBLT for Developing English Oral Production (2011-2025)

Joseline Mitzy Yagual Espinoza

doi:10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2026.11.39.1.15-29

Autores

Joseline Mitzy Yagual Espinoza Universidade Estadual de Milagro (UNEMI) https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2261-9493

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2026.11.39.1.15-29

Palavras-chave:

tarefas autênticas; produção oral, ensino baseado em tarefas, análise bibliométrica, inglês como língua estrangeira

Resumo

Este estudo apresenta uma análise bibliométrica da pesquisa sobre tarefas autênticas no Ensino de Línguas Baseado em Tarefas (TBLT) voltada ao desenvolvimento da produção oral em inglês, cobrindo o período de 2011-2025. O objetivo foi identificar tendências, autores influentes, redes de co-citação e padrões temáticos na literatura científica indexada no Scopus. Foram analisados 908 artigos de periódicos, selecionados por meio de um processo sistemático de busca e filtragem que excluiu revisões, capítulos de livros, estudos em que a língua de ensino era distinta do inglês e descritores não relacionados ao foco oral. A análise foi realizada com as ferramentas RStudio (pacote Bibliometrix) e VOSviewer, aplicando métricas de desempenho científico e mapeamento de redes de co-citação, coautoria e co-ocorrência de palavras-chave. Os resultados revelaram o domínio de periódicos especializados em tecnologia educacional (especialmente Computer Assisted Language Learning), a super-representação de contextos anglófonos e digitais, e a ênfase em dimensões linguísticas quantificáveis (fluência, precisão) em detrimento dos aspectos pragmáticos e afetivos. As obras fundacionais sobre TBLT e processamento de tarefas concentraram as maiores frequências de co-citação. Identificou-se uma desconexão entre a inovação tecnológica e os fundamentos teóricos do TBLT. Conclui-se que é necessário integrar perspectivas interdisciplinares, diversificar os contextos de pesquisa e desenvolver instrumentos de avaliação multidimensional que abordem as lacunas pragmáticas e afetivas ainda persistentes no campo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Joseline Mitzy Yagual Espinoza, Universidade Estadual de Milagro (UNEMI)

Docente universitária na Universidade Estadual de Milagro (UNEMI), Milagro, Equador, com cinco anos de experiência nas modalidades presencial, virtual e híbrida. Licenciada em Ciências da Educação, com habilitação em Língua Inglesa e Linguística (UNEMI); Mestre em Pedagogia dos Idiomas Nacionais e Estrangeiros, com especialização em inglês (UNEMI). Atualmente cursando um Mestrado em Gestão Educacional voltado para a liderança acadêmica. Suas linhas de pesquisa abrangem o ensino baseado em tarefas, a produção oral em inglês como língua estrangeira, a tecnologia educacional e a avaliação autêntica no ensino superior.

Referências

Anagnostopoulou, A., Hummel, H., & Martens, R. (2023). Authenticity of tasks in online ESL/EFL learning to foster transfer. Cogent Education, 10(1), Artículo 2190429. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2190429

Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2563–2583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z

Barkhuizen, G. (2011). Narrative knowledging in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 45(3), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.261888

Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2020). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1058–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293

Bruton, A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why… and why not. System, 41(3), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001

Burston, J. (2014a). MALL: The pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539

Burston, J. (2014b). The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103–125. Equinox Publishing.

Bygate, M. (1999). Quality of language and purpose of task: Patterns of learners' language on two oral communication tasks. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889900300302

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Collins, L., & Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305

Córdova, M., Suárez, R., Cabrera, A., & Plaza, S. (2024). Enfoques comunicativos en la enseñanza de idiomas: Estrategias para fomentar la competencia oral en la educación superior. Reincisol, 3(6), 4399–4419. https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V3(6)4399-4419

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00231.x

Ellis, R. (2021). Options in a task-based language-teaching curriculum. TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 11–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00002.ell

Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354

Frey, B. B., Schmitt, V. L., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Defining authentic classroom assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 17(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7275/sxbs-0829

Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000708

Hagoort, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009). The speaking brain. Science, 326(5951), 372–373. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1181675

Hsu, T.-C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007

Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Hu, J., & Liu, Y. (2023). The scientific basis of authentic assessment and its implementation in English as a foreign language education. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, Artículo 01023. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401023

Khamis, N., Yunus, M. M., & Mansor, A. Z. (2024). Language learning strategies used by Malaysian ESL students to improve English communication: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.22

Koh, K., Delanoy, N., Thomas, C., Bene, R., Chapman, O., Turner, J., … Hone, G. (2019). The role of authentic assessment tasks in problem-based learning. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 3, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/pplt.v3y2019.53144

Kormos, J. (2000). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100002011

Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085

Loewen, S. (2022). Functional adequacy, task-based language teaching and instructed second language acquisition. TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/task.21007.loe

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125

López, J. I., Becerra, A. P., & Ramírez-Avila, M. R. (2021). EFL speaking fluency through authentic oral production. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v6i1.10175

McKinley, J. (2019). Evolving the TESOL teaching–research nexus. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 875–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.509

Mendieta, K. A. (2021). Potenciando la producción oral en inglés: Estrategias y herramientas en el aula. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 6(29), Artículo e210815. https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v6i29.815

Norris, J. M. (2021). The Long road to TBLT. TASK: Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 162–183. https://doi.org/10.1075/task.21015.nor

Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587464

Ochoa-Angrino, S., Montes-González, J. A., Rojas-Ospina, T., & Valencia-Serrano, M. (2020). Perfiles momentáneos de compromiso a lo largo de tres clases de ciencias en estudiantes colombianos. Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines, 37(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2020.37.2.4

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Artículo n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peng, J.-E. (2019). The roles of multimodal pedagogic effects and classroom environment in willingness to communicate in English. System, 82, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.04.006

Phung, L. (2017). Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683561

Pullu, E. K., & Gömleksiz, M. N. (2021). Authentic teaching tasks for academic success, attitude, problem solving, and creative thinking skills. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 12(2), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2021-0020

Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners' engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368

Ramírez, S., & Artunduaga, M. (2018). Authentic tasks to foster oral production among English as a foreign language learners. HOW, 25(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.25.1.362

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27

Salgado, P., Abarca, N., & Damián, V. (2025). Aprendizaje basado en tareas (ABT) en la enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera. Revista de Investigación Educativa Niveles, 2(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.61347/rien.v2i1.70

Sandberg, J., Maris, M., & de Geus, K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1334–1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015

Segalowitz, N. (1991). Does advanced skill in a second language reduce automaticity in the first language? Language Learning, 41(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00676.x

Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.38

Skehan, P. (2009). Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047

Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302

Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428414

Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J. (2016). Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244

Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421

Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000039

Yang, Q., Chang, S., Hwang, G.-J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students' English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers & Education, 148, Artículo 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103808

Yuan, F. (1999). A framework for task-based learning. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 157-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588204

Zhang, X. (2025). Trends in language assessment and testing: A bibliometric study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 171–198. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.25141

Análise Bibliométrica de Tarefas Autênticas no TBLT para o Desenvolvimento da Produção Oral em Inglês (2011-2025)