- HTML Translated Version -
Sociocritical Study of Education in Venezuelan Cages
Author: Yudith Coromoto González Castro
Universidad Nacional Experimental “Rafael
María Baralt”, UNERMB
Valera, Venezuela
Abstract
The process of scientific reflection aims to
generate theoretical contributions derived from a sociocritical study of the
education of Venezuelan prisons. For this purpose, a documentary analysis was
carried out, under a wide bibliographical review, through which a set of
antecedents was obtained to configure the reality of the study fact. The
critical social process is carried out under the orientation of the
paradigmatic approach with a hermeneutical qualitative modality, in order to
organize the research work. As a theoretical basis classical and contemporary
theories of andragogical education were configured, as well as sociological
theories that serve as the basis for the theoretical-scientific construction
for the improvement of the educational practice of Venezuelan prisons.
Keywords:
education; prisons; penal sanctions.
|
Date Received: 15-06-2017 |
Date Acceptance: 12-10-2017 |
Estudio Sociocrítico de la Educación en las
Cárceles Venezolanas
Resumen
El proceso de reflexión científica tiene como propósito generar
aportes teóricos derivados de un estudio sociocrítico de la educación de
las cárceles venezolanas. Para ello se realizó un análisis de tipo documental,
bajo una profunda revisión bibliográfica, a través de la cual se recabó un
conjunto de antecedentes para configurar la realidad del hecho de estudio. El
proceso socio crítico se realizó bajo la orientación del enfoque paradigmático
con una modalidad cualitativa hermenéutica, con la finalidad de organizar las
labores de investigación. Como basamento teórico se configuraron teorías
clásicas y contemporáneas de la educación andragógica, así como teorías
sociológicas que sirven de base para la construcción teórico-científica para el
mejorar la práctica educativa de las cárceles venezolanas.
Palabras clave: educación; prisión; sanción penal.
|
Fecha de Recepción: 15-06-2017 |
Fecha de Aceptación: 12-10-2017 |
1.
Introduction
Sociocritical study is defined as an
accumulation of doctrines, sketches and hypotheses that react to the opposite
of the current of positivism. Such ideas establish the requirement to promote a
rational and liberating independence for people. In the opinion of Fernández
(2002: 18): "it is an investigative approach that promotes massive
participation and self-reflection". From this study we study the reality
of Venezuelan prisons in educational praxis, where the theory and practice are
contrasted, based on knowledge, including the participation of the actors of
analysis in the investigative process, as well as direct knowledge towards the
freedom of the human being.
According to the UNESCO Thesaurus
prison means prison, cell, prison, penitentiary, prison, where an individual
meets a criminal sanction, becoming a prisoner. In this regard, the Venezuelan
prisons from the orientation of the (UNESCO, 1998a), are spaces designed to
accommodate people who have violated the laws of society, whose purpose is to
reform those who do not respect the rules. In this establishment individuals
are detained in order to punish such situation.
From this scenario, it becomes
convenient to analyze education in Venezuelan prisons, according to the UNESCO
Thesaurus, education is defined as a method of learning, teaching and training
through various means: online learning, face-to-face teaching, correspondence
teaching , distance education, distance training, tele training and includes
various educational sciences and educational environment.
Education in Venezuelan prisons is
manifested as a complex regime to generate significant learning and changes
from the academic, social, cultural and personal point of view in those
deprived of liberty. In this sense, education in these areas should not be
detached from common social and political principles that are considered
inalienable rights. Therefore, education must be a system with equal
opportunities for all people (UNESCO, 1998b), including those deprived of their
liberty, which, although they grant them recognized equality, are merely formal
and contained in the legal texts in force, but it is not real to what occurs in
the prison environment, given that only access to educational claimants is
guaranteed, but not their permanence, prosecution, even graduation and formation
of values.
This means that the inmate who
demands the right to study will be recognized for his enrollment, but it will
depend on his effort and sacrifice to achieve the objectives, learning goals
and restitution of values. From this perspective, it is not about guaranteeing
the conditions of permanence, but of resistance to be able to survive within
the school process, where the progresses that are happening continuously in the
acquisition of knowledge, experiences and superior forms of behavior obey the
conditions social, that is, that possess perceptive, motor and intellectual
maturity to overcome difficulties and demands of the various types of learning
required to reintegrate back into society.
In this way, the educational success
of the inmate is not conditioned only to the factors of planning or educational
programming, but of personal maturation and the social factor to keep alive the
driving force of the motivation to remain, to continue, to graduate and to
restitute values. Since the current educational system of prisons is not
basically structured to meet previous demands.
This translates practically into the
need to insert an educational paradigm with andragogic bases, since currently
the education that is taught in the venues, attacks lethally the efficiency,
the academic quality that must be preserved and stimulated in the students to
be able to offer scientific knowledge, technological and humanistic, to
integral and autonomous development.
Therefore, to cover the crisis
situation that prisons experience from the educational point of view, we must
add the authentic intensity of changing the traditional educational structure
for an andragogic education whose presence will contribute to deepen the
deteriorated institutional, academic and administrative life of the education
system implemented so far.
Finally, this article proposes to
conduct a socio-critical study of education in Venezuelan prisons, in order to
provide reflections that lead to improve educational practice in these areas.
2.
Education in Venezuelan prisons
Education is relevant
in all stages of human development, but it reaches a valuable importance when
its beneficiaries are referred to those deprived of liberty, since it allows
them to increase their personal resources based on their reintegration into
society. From this perspective, education is an essential human right to be
able to train all the other rights, which has as an objective the integral
development of the subject. Consequently, the access of people to education
generates the creation of ties of belonging to society, that is, creates
communication and recreation of culture.
In reference to the
above, the State is in charge of guaranteeing and promoting the effective
enjoyment of education and of all human rights, since in theory the
incarcerated person is deprived of his ambulatory freedom, therefore, he must
enjoy and respect other constitutional rights.
In this way, education
in prisons in Latin America is submerged in a frank crisis, which every day
becomes more intense and proportionate, making the possibility of being subject
to an expected control that diminishes its inordinate depth deepening.
(Tunnermann, 2010). In effect, the crisis of education is defined by the fact
that the educational system clearly fails to give, totally or partially,
satisfaction or response to the specific problems posed, especially from the
point of view of the restitution of values.
In this line, it is
conceived that the nature and character of education, as well as teaching in
Venezuelan prisons, should stop being a process based on a pedagogical
criterion that ignores the adult condition of the student deprived of liberty,
without exaggerating, most of the teachers are fully or almost totally
convinced that the student in these centers can not be subjected to a situation
of authoritarianism in which the possibility of conscious, creative and
critical participation is reduced to the slightest expression, in accordance
with its integral formation, intellectual, emotional, social and ergological
development, (Picón, 2004). Therefore, the educational system must be
introduced in the light of the novel theory of andragogic education or of
adults.
The foregoing is
relevant, because the traditional education taught in prisons, in general,
denies the capacities for self-realization, autonomy, self-responsibility and
self-determination inherent to the adult status of the student, (Didriksson,
2010): situation that generates a state of psycho-socio-emotional regression in
which he should be subject of the process, since by forcing him to submit to
the rigid molds of a school structure to the rigor of pedagogism more amazing
as traditional education, he ends up resigning himself to being that that he
must practice an imposed behavior, acquiring a pattern to be able to think and
act in decision making and assume responsibilities in social life.
The presence of this
reality in the educational life of those deprived of liberty leads inexorably
to them disrespecting their right to form themselves as integral persons and
internalize the alienating spirit of submission and disrespect, which means the
renunciation of being an integral man owner of his present and of his future.
Therefore, it is an error not to try something to overcome, even partially,
this situation governed by the principles of anti-values. Doing nothing is
equivalent to maintaining one of the causes that determine the academic crisis
in prisons, that of remaining ineffective and untrained in values.
Consequently, while
those who make up the educational community of the prisons do not become aware
of this unobjectionable reality, it will be impossible to assume the condition
of agents of change in school renewal, for this, education programs are
considerable means to renew and to improve the educational exercise and the
educational organizational structure based on an andragogic education, with the
purpose of improving the training capacity, reconstructing what prevails today
in order to achieve to create and establish a dislocated education of the
weight of tradition without fear of the future , based on the andragogic
principles that will allow adapting interpersonal relationships (teacher -
student, student - student, teacher - authority), learning resources, content,
objectives, methodological strategies, in short the curriculum to the
bio-psycho-social nature of the members of the prison student community.
From this point of
view, the educational program of prisons must be composed of a set of subjects
that provide knowledge of the ideas, theories, schools and disciplines that
make up the andragogic theory and its philosophical, anthropological,
psychological, sociological, political approaches. Which has to be aimed at an
analytical - critical review of the various educational theories related to
education in the country, but also with the personal environment of the private
freedom, so that in this way a theoretical - practical plan is constituted -
critical of the formation of individuals and teachers.
Likewise, they must provide
knowledge in the first place on the theory of educational technology, covering
curricular and instructional design, as well as including practical training in
the techniques and methodologies of educational technology as an important part
in andragogic training. Secondly, the theory and training related to the
methodology of the research and its different modalities and applications must
be included, this whole conforms to the technological (not technocratic) and
heuristic level of the teacher's training.
As you can see, the
andrological education tries to take into account all the components that the
formation of the deprived of freedom includes so that it becomes an activity
where the teaching-learning process can be qualified with a continuity and horizontal
progressivity to achieve a unity didactic that integrates and involves all the
participants.
In this way,
educational programs and the andragogic updating of teachers and students
recompose the condition that has been the cause of the absence of a legitimate
practice of autonomy as a necessary condition for the full exercise of
educational life. In fact it can be said, without sinking simplicity and
ingenuity, that teachers, along with the directors and staff of the prison to
assume an authoritarian attitude towards the student has been allowed not to be
present the status of values in adults deprived of freedom, which is nothing
other than preventing him from responsibly taking on the possibility of
participating rationally, creatively and critically in education and values,
which has led to autonomy becoming a real fetish without full and concrete
realization in the prison education.
This is because the
nature and execution of autonomous education indisputably requires an adult
social base, that is, a community of adults that, conformed around the
achievement of desirable superior aims, not only of a professional-training
nature but also of investigation and of solution of vital problems, stimulate
the critical conscience and the creative capacity in all so that they are apt
in the future performance of the educational adults.
In other words, not
having an education with an andragogic base, will generate that students are not
in a position to better perform their dynamic and creative development by not
being able to promote and maintain their academic development and moral ethical
values.
From there, it is
clear the importance assumed by the current academic structural organization of
the prison education system and its functioning, since it requires the adoption
of the underlying praxis in the andragogic model (andragogic praxiology).
Therefore, it is imperative that the teaching staff have an exercise focused on
developing a rational interpretation of the nature of learning, immersed in the
formation of values and the role that must be fulfilled to appropriately
insert students deprived of liberty to society. Therefore, certain measures
must be taken with the aim of renewing and modernizing the old structures that
serve as the floor and framework of education in prisons.
This is how education
in prisons should direct its action to the training, andragogic updating of
teaching staff (Marcelo, 1995); It must also equip itself with a superior
capacity to focus and solve the educational problems that adult learning poses.
It must also seek to establish a formation that stimulates and deepens the
development of andragogic science.
3. Methodological Approach
The context of the research is limited to the reality of education in
Venezuelan prisons from an axiological perspective of the reintegration of the
inmates into society, the methodological approach was carried out from a
documentary point of view, reflective criticism.
Delimited the context of analysis, Venezuelan prisons and their
educational programs were selected as study actors, allowing to establish the
accuracy of the information. The data collection was carried out through the
documentary review technique and support in the primary sources such as
statements, articles, analysis on the educational reality in the prisons, as
well as in books, Web information, opinions of experts, among others.
The socio-critical analysis was conducted contrasting the documentary
information, with the opinions of experts and the reality of education in
prisons, generating knowledge and concrete reflections that help improve the
quality of education of prisoners in Venezuela.
4.
Conclusions
Education in
Venezuelan prisons faces a joint challenge of conjunctural, economic and social
elements such as: raising the quality of educational processes, economic
resources in smaller amounts than required; improve academic quality in
relation to the budgetary, financial and administrative aspects. Therefore,
this research was harmonized with the changing agenda of the management of
Venezuelan prisons, where the incorporation of innovative tools of
self-evaluation and self-regulation of educational functions is considered. It
is convenient to say that the idea of adult education in its various forms
and levels, formal or non-formal, must always be considered so that students
can develop and enrich their skills, knowledge, skills and attitudes, which it
would have inestimable repercussions in the advance and educational
development, by overcoming the limits imposed by the existing paroxysmal
pedagogy, as well as by the surrounding social life, by participating in the
processes of human assessment to promote the structural changes of society
(García, 2007) .
From this
context, it should also be borne in mind that another of the aspects present in
the crisis of prison education is the teaching staff, who have received very
little training from the criterion of the andragogic principles to impart a more
perceptive education to the private of freedom. It must be emphasized that
teacher training must be adapted to the needs of the prison education system,
since they are a necessity, since they constitute a determining factor in the
educational quality that is expected.
Therefore, it is
obvious that the effectiveness and efficiency of the formal andragogic
educational work to fulfill the function of contributing to the teaching
learning and restitution of the values of the inmates, depends mainly on the
teaching staff, as well as the adequate planning and supervision of the
educational process (Corredor, 2009).
In another order, we
must not lose sight of the fact that prisoners are, above all, subjects of
rights. And the State must be the guarantor of effective compliance with its
rights. Therefore, managers and staff who do active work as teachers should be
involved in the reality that prisons live to avoid the violation of human
rights and help private individuals to prepare themselves to face up to society
as integral persons.
It is recognized that
the majority of those held in prisons belong to the most vulnerable sectors of
society. Therefore, education becomes a right that recognizes other rights,
however, this reality is not true, since education has sometimes been denied or
poorly taught in prison.
Consequently, the
institutional approach to education in the context of the prison must be an
invitation to reflect on why, why and how education should be strengthened as a
right and not as a benefit, in order to be a reflection that contributes to the
design of an appropriate public policy that makes the educational process a
social space that professionally and personally trains those deprived of
liberty.
Finally, the findings of
this study contribute to the interpretation and understanding of education in
prisons, as a contribution to generate an effective and solid educational
system that allows integrating people integrity to society.
4. References
Corredor,
J. (2009). Las metas de la educación.
Una propuesta de transformación consejo de desarrollo científico y humanístico.
Caracas; Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Didriksson,
A. (2010). La educación y la innovación.
Caracas, Venezuela: Ediciones IESALC/UNESCO.
Fernández,
A. (2002). Filosofía, investigación,
innovación y buenas prácticas. México: Editorial UNAM.
García, G.
(2007). Conocimiento, educación y
sociedad en América Latina. Caracas, Venezuela: Cendes/Editorial Nueva
Sociedad.
Marcelo,
C. (1995). La formación del profesorado
para el cambio educativo. Barcelona, España: EUB.
Picón, G.
(2004). El proceso de convertirse en
educador. Ediciones de la Caracas, Venezuela: Universidad Pedagógica
Experimental Libertad.
Tunnermann,
B. (2010). La educación en América
latina. Bogotá, Colombia: En Universitas.
Tesauro de
la UNESCO (1977). Información de
vocablos. UNESCO. Recuperado de: http://vocabularies.unesco.org/browser/thesaurus/es/
UNESCO.
(1998a,b). Declaración mundial sobre la
educación en el siglo XXI. Visión y
Acción y Marco de Acción Prioritaria para el Cambio y el Desarrollo de la
Educación superior. París, Francia: Conferencia Mundial sobre la Educación
Superior. Recuperado de: http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_spa.htm
Yudith Coromoto
González Castro
e-mail: yudithgonzalez@live.com
Born in Valera state Trujillo, Venezuela. I'm
a Doctor in Education from the Universidad Nacional Experimental “Rafael María
Baralt” (UNERMB), MSc. in Teaching for Higher Education (year 2008), from the
Universidad Nacional Experimental “Rafael María Baralt” (UNERMB), MSc. in
Educational Management Mention Education (year 2003), of the Universidad
Pedagógica Experimental Libertador (UPEL), Diploma in Semiotics of the Núcleo
Universitario “Rafael Rangel” (NURR-ULA), Diploma in Methodology of the Núcleo
Universitario “Rafael Rangel” (NURR- ULA) and the Universidad Pedagógica
Experimental Libertador (UPEL).
Enter M.P.P.S.P. on
March 6, 2012, by transfer of the National Directorate of the Penitentiary
Service to the Ministry of Popular Power for the Penitentiary Service,
according to Decree No. 8,828 dated March 6, 2012, published in the Official
Gazette of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela No. 39877 dated March 6, 2012.
I currently work in
the Penitentiary Center of the Andean Region (CPRA), Mérida, Venezuela, with 11
years of service.
The content of this manuscript
is disseminated under a Creative Commons License
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
- Original Version in Spanish -
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29394/Scientific.issn.2542-2987.2018.3.8.12.234-247